Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Toward the Use of ChatGPT in English Language Writing

Authors

  • Farras Gunawan Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Salwa Mujtahida Rahmah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Rafly Rusdyansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Naf'an Tarihoran Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v6i02.2604

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Perceptions, Attitudes, English language writing, EFL learners

Abstract

This study examined Indonesian EFL learners' perceptions and attitudes toward ChatGPT in English language writing and the relationship between them, a pairing few studies have addressed simultaneously. Using a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from 110 Indonesian EFL students through an 18-item Likert-scale questionnaire (Cronbach's α = 0.894). Students held positive perceptions of ChatGPT as a writing support tool (M = 3.75), while overall attitudes were neutral (M = 3.22). This neutral aggregate, however, conceals a meaningful internal structure: skill degradation concern was the dominant attitudinal response (A4: M = 4.05, 78.2%), while full AI delegation and uncritical output adoption were the most strongly rejected behaviors (A8: M = 2.86; A9: M = 2.68), suggesting an “aware but resisting passive dependence” orientation. A moderate positive correlation between the two constructs (r = 0.482, p < 0.001) confirms that utility appraisals shape, but do not fully determine, attitudinal formation. These findings suggest that learners are already exercising evaluative agency over AI use, and that instruction should build on rather than ignore this disposition.

References

Al-Obaydi, L. H., & Pikhart, M. (2025). AI partner versus human partner: comparing AI-based peer assessment with human-generated peer assessment in examining writing skills. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1), 38. https://doi .org/10.1186/s40468-025-00375-8

Alharbi, W. (2023). Research Article AI in the Foreign Language Classroom : A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023. https://doi .org/10.1155/2023/4253331

Almansour, N. (2024). Investigating Factors Influencing EFL Learners ’ Behavioral Intentions to Adopt ChatGPT for Language Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(6), 1910–1918. https://doi .org/10.17507/jltr.1506.16

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi. org/10.61969/jai.1337500

Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745

Boudouaia, A., Mouas, S., & Kouider, B. (2024). A Study on ChatGPT-4 as an Innovative Approach to Enhancing English as a Foreign Language Writing Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62, 1–29. https://doi .org/10.1177/07356331241247465

Chan, C. K. Y. (2025). Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’: investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8087–8108. https://doi .org/10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7

Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). The impact of Generative AI ( GenAI ) on practices , policies and research direction in education : a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6188–6203. https://doi .org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi .org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era : An exploration of EFL students ’ perceptions , benefits , and limitations Critical thinking in the AI era : An exploration of EFL students ’ perceptions , benefits , and. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi .org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342

Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2024). Beware of metacognitive laziness : Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation , processes , and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 489–530. https://doi .org/10.1111/bjet.13544

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi .org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Helen H. Hyun. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society : Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 1–28. https://doi .org/10.3390/soc15010006

Godwin-jones, R. (2024). Distributed agency in second language learning and teaching through generative AI. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 5–31. https://doi .org/10.64152/10125/73570

Granić, A. (2022). Educational Technology Adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9725–9744. https://api .semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247976567

Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model in Educational Context: A Systematic Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi .org/10.1111/bjet.12864

Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2024). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8435–8463. https://doi .org/10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0

Hussain, S. (2024). Application of the ABC Model of Attitudes (Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive) in the Age of AI-Generated Videos. Social Science Review Archives, 2022, 871–880. https://doi .org/10.70670/sra.v2i2.367

Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi .org/10.1017/9781108693974

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kim, S., So, H.-J., & Park, K. (2025). Supporting learner agency in collaborative writing with generative AI. British Journal of Educational Technology, February, 1–25. https://doi .org/10.1111/bjet.70015

Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125–138. https://doi .org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316

Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi .org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students ’ writing : EFL teachers ’ perspective The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students ’ writing : EFL teachers ’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi .org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers ’ trust in AI- ­ powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914–931. https://doi .org/10.1111/bjet.13232

Nazari, N., Salman, M., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Heliyon Application of Arti fi cial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education : randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi .org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

Nelson, A. S., Santamaría, P. V, Javens, J. S., & Ricaurte, M. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language. Education Sciences, 15(5). https://doi .org/10.3390/educsci15050611

Polakova, P., Ivenz, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students ’ writing skills students ’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi .org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi .org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Schober, P., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi .org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(December), 1–14. https://doi .org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843

Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 100752. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi .org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Teng, M. F. (2024a). A Systematic Review of ChatGPT for English as a Foreign Language Writing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 36–57. https://doi .org/10 .58304/ijts.20240304

Teng, M. F. (2024b). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

Teng, M. F. (2025). Metacognitive Awareness and EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Experiences in Utilising ChatGPT for Writing Feedback. European Journal of Education, 60, 1–17. https://doi .org/10.1111/ejed.12811

Thi, X. H. N., Thien, H. V. H., Vuong, K. N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2025). Enhancing writing skills through AI-powered tools: perceived benefits and challenges among Vietnamese EFL students. Discover Education, 4(1), 472. https://doi .org/10.1007/s44217-025-00905-9

Wang, Q. (2025). EFL learners ’ motivation and acceptance of using large language models in English academic writing : an extension of the UTAUT model. January, 1–12. https://doi .org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1514545

Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of english as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101071. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071

Werdiningsih, I., Indrawati, I., Rusdin, D., Ivone, M., & Basthomi, Y. (2024). Revolutionizing EFL writing : unveiling the strategic use of ChatGPT by Indonesian master ’ s students Revolutionizing EFL writing : unveiling the strategic use of ChatGPT by Indonesian master ’ s students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi .org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2399431

Werdiningsih, I., Marzuki, & Rusdin, D. (2024). Balancing AI and authenticity : EFL students ’ experiences with ChatGPT in academic writing. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi .org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2392388

Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943–13967. https://doi .org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

Gunawan, F., Rahmah, S. M., Rusdyansyah, R., & Tarihoran, N. (2026). Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Toward the Use of ChatGPT in English Language Writing. JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN, 6(02), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v6i02.2604